1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 700 F.Supp.
  5. 700 F.Supp. 71 (1988)
 

CROSBY-BEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civ. A. No. 88-1920.

700 F.Supp. 71 (1988)

Anthony CROSBY-BEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

December 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Crosby-Bey and Freddie Artis-Bey, pro se.

Harry Toussaint Alexander, Jr., Frederick D. Cooke, Martin L. Grossman, and Paul A. Quander, Jr. of the Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for defendants.

ORDER

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, who are inmates at the Minimum Security Facility at Lorton, filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because they claim defendants violated their right to be free from ex post facto laws by omitting a meritorious good time provision from the Good Time Credit Act of 1986. In addition, plaintiffs claim that the Good Time Credit Act of 1986 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases