1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 110 N.J.
  5. 110 N.J. 644 (1988)
 

HIRSCH v. TUSHILL, LTD., INC.

110 N.J. 644 (1988)

542 A.2d 897

WILLIAM S. HIRSCH; WILLIAM PITT, III; PERCY C. STANLEY; EUGENE R. BEARDSLEE; THEODORE J. PYRTEK; HAROLD BUSHBERG; FRANK STUHLMAN; LEONARD ALCARO; DONNA MOTORS, EMIL J. ABAGNALE, PROP.; T.G.S., INC.; WILLIAM CADIEUX; HARRY CORSON; AND MARGO REBEIL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TUSHILL, LTD., INC.; AND JAMES P. TUCHINSKY; RUIZ AND SONS AUTO SALVAGE; UNITED GRAPHICS CORPORATION; AND NEW JERSEY NATURAL GAS CO., DEFENDANTS, AND JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 29, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Sicola, argued the cause for appellant (Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, attorneys; Richard E. Arvidson, of counsel).

Douglas S. Brierley, argued the cause for respondent (William R. Albrecht, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

A jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Jersey Central Power & Light Company (JCP & L). Pending its appeal to the Appellate Division JCP & L posted a supersedeas bond, pursuant to Rules 2:9-5(a) and 2:9-6(a), staying execution of the judgment. The Appellate Division reversed the judgment for plaintiffs and awarded JCP & L its costs on appeal. The question now posed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases