Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the People elicited improper testimony from the victim that he had identified the defendant from a photograph prior to the lineup has not been preserved for appellate review since no objection was made at the time the testimony was given (CPL 470.05 [2]). Moreover, a reversal in the interest of justice is not warranted. Evidence that a victim has been shown a picture of the defendant is inadmissible...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
