1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 696 F.Supp.
  5. 696 F.Supp. 37 (1988)
 

BRIGNOLI v. BALCH, HARDY & SCHEINMAN, INC.

No. 86 Civ. 4103 (RWS).

696 F.Supp. 37 (1988)

Richard J. BRIGNOLI, Plaintiff, v. BALCH, HARDY & SCHEINMAN, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 3, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arie E. David, New York City (Michael E. Plank, of counsel), Scheffler Karlinsky & Stein, New York City (Martin E. Karlinsky, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Kramer, Levin, Nessen, Kamin & Frankel, New York City (Charlotte M. Fischman, Barton L. Seebach, of counsel), Jacobson & Triggs, New York City (John F. Triggs, of counsel), for defendant.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Balch, Hardy & Scheinman, Inc. ("Balch, Hardy") has moved by order to show cause to dismiss the complaint in this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that plaintiff Richard J. Brignoli ("Brignoli") is a citizen of the State of New York, not of Connecticut, and thus diversity between parties is lacking. Brignoli has cross-motioned for sanctions against defendant's attorneys. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases