STATE v. CARRUTH

No. 2 CA-SA 88-0124.

160 Ariz. 573 (1988)

774 P.2d 1363

The STATE of Arizona, Petitioner, v. The Honorable James CARRUTH, Judge of the Superior Court, In and For the County of Pima, State of Arizona, Div. V, Respondent. and Anthony LUZANILLA and Lee Emil Engebretson, Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Review Denied July 17, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen D. Neely, Pima County Atty. by Thomas J. Zawada, Tucson, for petitioner.

Pima County Legal Defender by Michael J. Cruikshank, Tucson, for real party in interest Luzanilla.

Marshall D. Tandy, Tucson, for real party in interest Engebretson.


OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This special action was taken from the order of the trial court denying the state's motion to depose the real parties in interest pursuant to Ariz.R.Crim.P. 15.3, 17 A.R.S. The petition presents a question pertaining to the applicability of the immunity statute, A.R.S. § 13-4064, to the criminal discovery rules. Because the state has no equally plain, speedy or adequate remedy by appeal, we accept jurisdiction.

The factual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases