1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 202 Cal.App.3d
  5. 202 Cal.App.3d 525 (1988)
 

HEJMADI v. AMFAC, INC.

Docket No. A035675.

202 Cal.App.3d 525 (1988)

249 Cal. Rptr. 5

VIVEK HEJMADI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AMFAC, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

June 27, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Nikolai Tehin, Colin H. Jewell and Bostwick & Tehin for Plaintiff and Appellant.

McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, Loyd W. McCormick, Gregory P. Landis and John J. McGuirk for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

BENSON, J.

Plaintiff Vivek Hejmadi appeals from a judgment dismissing his second amended complaint following the sustaining, without leave to amend, of defendants' demurrer to the sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth causes of action. Because we have determined that the second amended complaint successfully pleads a cause of action for a contractual remedy for breach of an implied in fact agreement not to discharge except for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases