Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The testimony of a nonaccomplice witness that the defendant had admitted participating in the bank robbery was sufficient to corroborate the testimony of an accomplice as required by CPL 60.22 (see, People v Miller,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.