Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court erred by denying, without a hearing, that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress certain identification testimony. However, since the facts alleged in his application failed, as a matter of law, to support his request for suppression, a hearing was not required (see, People v Thompson,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
