1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 142 A.D.2d
  5. 142 A.D.2d 563 (1988)
 

RICHARDSON v. RICHARDSON

142 A.D.2d 563 (1988)

Lugenia Richardson, Respondent, v. James O. Richardson, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 5, 1988

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In view of the fact that the defendant husband, who was at all times represented by counsel, consented after judicial inquiry to the subject stipulation in open court, his conclusory allegations of unfairness or unconscionability are without evidentiary value (see, McDougall v McDougall, 129 A.D.2d 685; Jensen v Jensen

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases