Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting the scope of the testimony of the plaintiffs' expert witness (see, Meiselman v Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 N.Y. 389). While the witness was a mechanical engineer and had extensive work experience in the specialized area of the safety engineering of vehicles, his expertise did not embrace the design or development of golf courses or of any...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
