NOLAN v. BORKOWSKI

(13236)

206 Conn. 495 (1988)

WENDY NOLAN ET AL. v. ALAN BORKOWSKI ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released March 15, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert Watstein, with whom, on the brief, was John F. Warton, Jr., for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Constance L. Epstein, for the appellees (defendants).

PETERS, C. J., SHEA, CALLAHAN, COVELLO and HULL, JS.


HULL, J.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether the named plaintiff, Wendy Nolan, submitted proof of the individual defendants' intent to injure her sufficient to resist the defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground of the exclusivity of the workers' compensation benefits available to her for those injuries. We agree with the trial court that she failed to raise an issue of material fact as to such intent and therefore we find no error in the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases