1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 228 N.J.
  5. 228 N.J. Super. 453 (1988)
 

DeVIVO v. ASCHER

228 N.J. Super. 453 (1988)

550 A.2d 163

EILEEN DEVIVO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CROSS-RESPONDENT v. MICHAEL ASCHER, JOHN DOE I (A FICTITIOUS NAME), JOHN DOE II (A FICTITIOUS NAME), JANE DOE I (A FICTITIOUS NAME) AND JANE DOE II (A FICTITIOUS NAME), DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 25, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Mella argued the cause for appellant, cross-respondent (Weiseman, Mella & Ruotolo, attorneys; James A. Mella, on the brief).

Kathryn J. Kingree and Cynthia Goldman argued the cause for respondents, cross-appellants (Voorhees & Acciavatti, attorneys; Kathryn J. Kingree and Cynthia Goldman, of counsel and on the briefs).

Before Judges PETRELLA and SHEBELL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Eileen DeVivo appeals from an order of the Law Division granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Michael Ascher. 221 N.J.Super. 28. The complaint alleged that defendant, an attorney, had caused to be published defamatory statements regarding plaintiff. The grant of summary judgment was based upon the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases