1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 224 N.J.
  5. 224 N.J. Super. 455 (1988)
 

BI-CTY. DEV. CORP. v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF OAKLAND BOR.

224 N.J. Super. 455 (1988)

540 A.2d 927

BI-COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND, ETC. DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County/Mercer County (Mount Laurel II Litigation).

Decided February 29, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl S. Bisgaier for plaintiff.

Brian M. Chewcaskie for defendant (Gittleman, Muhlstock & Meyers, attorneys).

SKILLMAN, J.S.C.

This is a Mount Laurel case. See So. Burlington Cty. N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laurel Tp., 92 N.J. 158 (1983). On June 30, 1987, a scheduling order was entered which directed defendant, Borough of Oakland, to notify this court whether it intended to file a fair share housing plan with the Council on Affordable Housing (council) and move for a transfer to the council. The order further provided that in the event...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases