Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant challenges the propriety of the hearing court's decision to permit the complainant and two other witnesses, Mitzie Lau and Sheri Watson, to make in-court identifications of him.
Initially, we find that the hearing court properly declined to suppress the complainant's in-court identification testimony. There is no evidence in the record to indicate that the photographic array and the lineup which were viewed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
