Ordered that the order and judgment are affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Trial Judge properly exercised its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial based on certain comments made by the Trial Judge concerning the existence of an "epidermoid tumor". It is well settled that "[a] motion for a mistrial is directed to the sound discretion of the trial court" (see, Harris v Village of E. Hills,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.