1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 206 Cal.App.3d
  5. 206 Cal.App.3d 449 (1988)
 

KONICA BUSINESS MACHINES v. REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY

Docket No. D006857.

206 Cal.App.3d 449 (1988)

253 Cal. Rptr. 591

KONICA BUSINESS MACHINES U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents; COPY-LINE CORPORATION, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

November 23, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cutler & Cutler and Paul R. Salerno for Plaintiff and Appellant.

James E. Holst, Gary Morrison, Susan Amateau and David A. Dorinson for Defendants and Respondents.

Shenas, Shaw & Spievak, Peter Shenas and Douglas S. Waggaman for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

WORK, J.

After Konica Business Machines U.S.A., Inc. (Konica), unsuccessfully bid for a contract to provide copier services to the University of California (University), it sought a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 1085) challenging the award of the contract to Copy-Line Corporation. Appealing from the denial of its petition, Konica contends (1) Copy-Line's bid did not comply with the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases