1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 37 Ohio
  5. 37 Ohio St. 3d 26 (1988)
 

BISPECK v. BD. OF COMMRS. OF TRUMBULL CTY.

No. 86-2087.

37 Ohio St. 3d 26 (1988)

[THE STATE, EX REL.] BISPECK, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF TRUMBULL COUNTY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 25, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy & Macala Co., L.P.A., Dennis Haines and Barry Laine, for appellant.

Dennis Watkins, prosecuting attorney, and Paul E. Heltzel, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

An action in mandamus is a proper course by which laid-off county employees may seek to compel their employer to abide by orders of the State Personnel Board of Review disaffirming their layoffs. State, ex rel. Potten, v. Kuth (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 321, 15 O.O. 3d 391, 401 N.E.2d 929.

In answering such a complaint for a writ of mandamus, however, the appointing authority may raise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases