1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 374 S.E.2d
  5. 374 S.E.2d 237 (1988)
 

ALLSUP v. ALLSUP

No. 102PA88.

374 S.E.2d 237 (1988)

323 N.C. 603

Jacquelin S. ALLSUP v. Guy L. ALLSUP, Jr.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Petree Stockton & Robinson by J. Neil Robinson, Charlotte, for petitioner-appellee.

James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A. by William K. Diehl, Jr. and Barbara J. Hellenschmidt, Charlotte, for respondent-appellant.

MARTIN, Justice.

The sole issue for review in this alimony case is whether the registration and enforcement provisions of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) violate the due process rights of support obligors. We hold that they do not and therefore affirm the Court of Appeals.

Summarized as briefly as possible, the record reveals the following pertinent facts:

South Carolina Proceedings

The parties to this suit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases