1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 202 Cal.App.3d
  5. 202 Cal.App.3d 409 (1988)
 

ESPINOSA v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. A039154.

202 Cal.App.3d 409 (1988)

248 Cal. Rptr. 375

SALVADOR ESPINOSA, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Respondent; CITY OF PITTSBURG et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

June 23, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Gene Cain and Cain & Cain for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Sellar, Hazard, Snyder, Kelly & Fitzgerald, James V. Fitzgerald, Stephanie Gray, Gibbons, Lees, Schaefer & Edrington and Dolores M. Donohoe for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

CHANNELL, J.

Petitioner Salvador Espinosa's 1987 amendment to his 1984 complaint added an allegation that the City of Pittsburg, the real party in interest in this action, violated his federal civil rights. Respondent court sustained a demurrer to this amendment without leave to amend on the ground that the statute of limitations had run. Espinosa applied to this court for a writ of mandate. We find that the superior court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases