1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 418 N.W.2d
  5. 418 N.W.2d 191 (1988)
 

CHIN v. ZOET

No. C2-87-1268.

418 N.W.2d 191 (1988)

Frank Taiping CHIN, et al., Appellants, v. Robert L. ZOET, et al., H.T. Ferguson, et al., Ferris O. Grosky, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary B. Balkenhol, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 26, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C.A. Johnson, II, Johnson & Moonan Law Firm, Mankato, for Frank Taiping Chin, et al., appellants.

Norbert P. Smith, Walker & Smith, P.A., Mankato, for Robert L. Zoet, et al., respondents.

John M. Riedy, McLean, Peterson Law Firm, Chtd., Mankato, for H.T. Ferguson, et al., respondents.

Scott V. Kelly, Farrish, Johnson & Maschka, Mankato, for Ferris O. Grosky, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mary B. Balkenhol, respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and FOLEY and WOZNIAK, JJ.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellants Frank Taiping Chin and Yen Yen Chin sued for rescission of their contract for deed with respondents Robert L. Zoet and Julie A. Zoet, and for return of all monies paid on the grounds the respondents failed to tender marketable title by the time prescribed in their contract for deed and that a reasonable time expired before respondents perfected title.1 The

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases