HOYT INV. v. BLOOMINGTON COM. & TR. CTR.

No. C5-86-2131.

418 N.W.2d 173 (1988)

HOYT INVESTMENT COMPANY, et al., Respondents, v. BLOOMINGTON COMMERCE AND TRADE CENTER ASSOCIATES, et al., Petitioners, Appellants, The Port Authority of the City of Bloomington, The City of Bloomington, and The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 22, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Sheran, Theresa B. Bonner, Luke H. Terhaar, Minneapolis, for Bloomington Commerce and Trade Center.

James R. Bresnahan, William D. Paul, St. Paul, for Hoyt Inv.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


COYNE, Justice.

On petition of Bloomington Commerce and Trade Center Associates, a partnership between individuals William O. Cooley and Arthur J. Petrie, we granted further review of an order of the court of appeals which granted respondent Hoyt Investment Company's petition for extraordinary relief and directed the trial court to enter judgment in favor of Hoyt in accordance with the court of appeals' earlier opinion in Hoyt Investment Company v. Bloomington...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases