Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court was required to hold a hearing before denying his pro se motion which sought the dismissal of the indictment on the ground that he was denied his right to a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.20. In his moving papers, the defendant contended that there had been a delay of 11 months and 15 days which was entirely chargeable to the People. Now on appeal, the defendant maintains his motion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
