1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 145 Wis.2d
  5. 145 Wis.2d 439 (1988)
 

HASSELBLAD v. CITY OF GREEN BAY

No. 87-2261.

145 Wis.2d 439 (1988)

427 N.W.2d 140

Walter HASSELBLAD and Marie Hasselblad, d/b/a Hasselblad Machine Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF GREEN BAY, Defendant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided June 7, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For appellants there were briefs and oral argument by George Burnett and Liebmann, Conway, Olejniczak & Jerry, S.C., Green Bay.

For respondent there was a brief by Timothy J. Kelley, city attorney, and James M. Kalny, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Timothy J. Kelley, Green Bay.

Before Cane, P.J., LaRocque and Myse, JJ.

LaROCQUE, J.

The plaintiffs, Walter and Marie Hasselblad, d/b/a Hasselblad Machine Company, seek to have declared unconstitutional the Wisconsin statute setting a $50,000 limit on business replacement damages in eminent domain proceedings. They claim that the limit is contrary to art. I, sec. 13, of the Wisconsin Constitution, which provides: "The property of no person shall be taken for public use without just compensation therefor." Because the Hasselblads

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases