1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 363 S.E.2d
  5. 363 S.E.2d 215 (1988)
 

BURROW v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP.

No. 8721SC359.

363 S.E.2d 215 (1988)

88 N.C. App. 347

Billy Joe BURROW v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. and Westinghouse Transport Leasing Corporation.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 5, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rabil & Rabil by S. Mark Rabil, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellant.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice by Guy F. Driver, Jr., M. Ann Anderson, and C. Daniel Barrett, Winston-Salem, for defendants-appellees.

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Plaintiff's first claim for relief is based on G.S. 97-6.1, which reads, in relevant part, as follows:

(a) No employer may discharge or demote any employee because the employee has instituted or caused to be instituted, in good faith, any proceeding under the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act, or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding. (b) Any employer who violates any provision of this section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases