Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that the jury's verdict is repugnant because it acquitted him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees. Because the defendant did not raise this issue prior to the discharge of the jury the matter is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Satloff,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.