KIMBALL v. MILLET

No. 10508-0-II.

52 Wn. App. 512 (1988)

762 P.2d 10

CLAYTON KIMBALL, ET AL, Respondents, v. EARL LAMAR MILLET, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

September 29, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold B. Field, Wayne Murray, and Murray, Dunham & Murray, for petitioners.

George L. Wood, Jr., and Platt, Irwin, Colley, Oliver, Miller & Wood, for respondents.


WORSWICK, J.

We accepted discretionary review, on the application of Earl and Vina Mae Millet, of an order denying their motion for summary judgment of dismissal of this action, brought against them by Clayton Kimball for personal injuries caused by an aggressive bull. The bull was owned by a farming corporation that employed both Kimball and the Millets. The injuries were sustained on farmland owned by the Millets, but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases