IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL OF ADOPTION OF RULES REGARDING PROPERTY DISPOSITION OF A CASINO LICENSEE (N.J.A.C. 19:41-7.2(A)).
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued September 16, 1987.
Decided March 30, 1988.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Peter G. Sheridan argued the cause for appellant Atlantic City Casino Association.
Katherine A. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Division of Gaming Enforcement (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
Leonard J. DiGiacomo, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Casino Control Commission (Robert J. Genatt, Attorney).
David G. Sciarra, Assistant Deputy Public Advocate, argued the cause for respondent Department of the Public Advocate (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Advocate, attorney).
Before Judges KING, GRUCCIO and D'ANNUNZIO.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GRUCCIO, J.A.D.
The Casino Control Commission (Commission), recognizing that the growth of the casino industry in New Jersey is not limited to the boardwalk area in Atlantic City, enacted a regulation designed to give it greater oversight of the casino industry's real estate activities. Given the great control the casino industry has over the real estate in the Atlantic City...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
