PEE DEE STATE BANK v. PROSSER

1136

295 S.C. 229 (1988)

367 S.E.2d 708

PEE DEE STATE BANK, Respondent v. Larry N. PROSSER, J. Oral Strickland, Tina L. Strickland, and Universal Mortgage Corporation of Wisconsin, Defendants, of whom Larry N. Prosser, Tina L. Strickland, and Universal Mortgage Corporation of Wisconsin are Appellants.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided April 11, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence B. Orr, John R. Chase, James C. Rushton, III, and Mary Layton Wells, Florence, for appellants.

Ray Coit Yarborough, Timmonsville, for respondent.


Heard Feb. 23, 1988.

Decided April 11, 1988.

CURETON, Judge:

Pee Dee State Bank brought a mortgage foreclosure action against Oral and Tina Strickland. The suit involves a series of transactions concerning a condominium. The primary issues are equitable subrogation, novation, accord and satisfaction, and release. The trial judge found Pee Dee had a valid mortgage and was entitled to a judgment of foreclosure and deficiency arising from the sale of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases