PLANNED MKTG v. COATS & CLARK


71 N.Y.2d 442 (1988)

Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc., Appellant, v. Coats and Clark, Inc., Respondent. In the Matter of Coats and Clark, Inc., Respondent, v. Dry Dock Savings Bank et al., Respondents, and Edwin Lee, Individually and as Alleged Trustee of the Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided March 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Geller for Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc., appellant, and Edwin Lee, appellant pro se.

Joseph J. Schiavone and Edwin David Robertson for Coats & Clark, Inc., respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, HANCOCK, JR., BELLACOSA and DILLON concur.


ALEXANDER, J.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) (29 USC § 1001 et seq.) mandates that all State laws, insofar as they relate to employee benefit plans, are superseded (29 USC § 1144 [a]) and that benefits provided by an employee benefit plan qualified under the act may not be assigned or alienated (29 USC § 1056 [d] [1]). The question presented is whether these provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases