PAIVA v. PFEIFFER


229 N.J. Super. 276 (1988)

551 A.2d 201

MARIA PAIVA AND FERNANDO PAIVA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MICHAEL PFEIFFER AND DANCHEM INC., T/A COLONIAL CHEMICALS AND KENNETH A. RAYMOND, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 16, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Waters, McPherson, McNeill, Fitzpatrick, attorneys for appellants (Joseph G. Ragno, on the brief).

Frederick W. Stevens, attorney for respondents (Norman K. Zeiner, on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, MUIR and KEEFE.


KEEFE, J.S.C. temporarily assigned.

The issues to be decided on this appeal are: 1) whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury, pursuant to Dolson v. Anastasia, 55 N.J. 2 (1969), that a violation of N.J.S.A. 39:4-89 is negligence as a matter of law under the facts of this case; and 2) whether instructing the jury on the sudden emergency doctrine constituted plain error.

Maria and Fernando Paiva...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases