Per Curiam.
The appellate court based its denial of appellant's complaint for a writ of mandamus on the ground that appellant's counsel failed to timely file the amendments to the VSSR application. The court stated that "[t]he commission hearing officer granted two weeks to allow amendment. Such permission was within the hearing officer's discretion. The relator took almost six weeks to file her amendment."
This conclusion is not supported by the record...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
