1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 40 Ohio
  5. 40 Ohio St. 3d 8 (1988)
 

STATE, EX REL. FYFFE, v. PIERCE

No. 88-929.

40 Ohio St. 3d 8 (1988)

THE STATE, EX REL. FYFFE ET AL., v. PIERCE, JUDGE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 30, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kincaid, Cultice & Geyer and Peter N. Cultice, for relator Fyffe.

Norman Davitt, county public defender, for relator McVay.

William M. Owens, prosecuting attorney, and Brent W. Shenk, for respondent.

Frase, Weir, Baker & McCullough Co., L.P.A., Eugene R. Weir and R. Q. Baker III, urging denial for amicus curiae, The Tribune.

Per Curiam.

"In order for a writ of prohibition to issue, relators must establish: (1) that the court or officer against whom it is sought is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) that the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law, and (3) that the refusal of the writ will result in injury for which no other adequate remedy exists." Commercial Savings Bank v. Court of Common Pleas (1988), 35 Ohio St.3d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases