Per Curiam.
The crux of this appeal involves appellant's assertions that the commission wrongfully relied upon the reports of Drs. Turton and McCloud and that the only qualified evidence before the commission was the report of appellant's treating physician, Dr. Williams, which supported appellant's prayer for permanent and total disability compensation. Appellant supports these claims by citing State, ex rel. Anderson, v. Indus. Comm. (1980)...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
