1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 200 Cal.App.3d
  5. 200 Cal.App.3d 272 (1988)
 

PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. A038891.

200 Cal.App.3d 272 (1988)

245 Cal. Rptr. 873

PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & COMPANY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

April 14, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Boake Christensen, James B. Lewis, Leslie G. Landau, David M. Heilbron and McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Randall P. Borcherding, Deputy Attorney General, Jan T. Chilton, Robert L. Lofts, Donald J. Querio and Severson, Werson, Berke & Melchior for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

HANING, J.

The accounting firm of Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company (Peat Marwick), defendant in an accounting malpractice action, petitions for extraordinary relief from an order precluding it from controverting plaintiffs' evidence on certain elements of the malpractice allegations. After Peat Marwick merged with KMG Main Hurdman (Main Hurdman), the accounting firm retained by plaintiffs as their expert witness, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases