ROSS v. BARTZ

No. 2 CA-CV 88-0118.

158 Ariz. 305 (1988)

762 P.2d 592

Arthur ROSS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Jay I. BARTZ and Marian Bartz, husband and wife; Jay I. Bartz, Ltd., a professional corporation; Sandia Investments, S.A., Defendants/Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

Review Denied October 25, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Thinnes, P.A. by Thomas A. Thinnes and Martin Lieberman, Phoenix, for plaintiff/appellee.

Beer & Toone, P.C. by Stephen C. Ryan, Phoenix, for defendants/appellants.


OPINION

LACAGNINA, Chief Judge.

Jay Bartz and Sandia Investments, S.A., appeal from the trial court's order granting a new trial, ruling that it had erred in failing to instruct the jury on breach of fiduciary duty or trust, in an action brought by Arthur Ross against Bartz and Sandia for legal malpractice and/or breach of fiduciary duty based upon Bartz's investment of Ross's money held in trust by Bartz. Bartz argues that the acceptance of client's funds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases