1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 202 Cal.App.3d
  5. 202 Cal.App.3d 255 (1988)
 

HEILY v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. A040522.

202 Cal.App.3d 255 (1988)

248 Cal. Rptr. 673

KATHRYN A. HEILY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

June 20, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Shand S. Stephens, Patricia H. Cullison and Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

W. Reece Bader, Frederick Brown, Jay M. Cutler and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

MERRILL, J.

Petitioner, the plaintiff in a wrongful discharge action, challenges a court order requiring her to arbitrate her dispute under procedures established by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE hereinafter). She contends both that her agreement to arbitrate was procured by fraud and that it should be set aside as unconscionable because of institutional bias in arbitration conducted under the auspices of the NYSE. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases