BELLACOSA v. REVIEW BD.


72 N.Y.2d 383 (1988)

In the Matter of Joseph W. Bellacosa, as Chief Administrative Judge of the Unified Court System of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Classification Review Board of the Unified Court System of the State of New York et al., Respondents. Primrose Shafer et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 18, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Colodner and Patricia P. Satterfield for appellant.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Maryellen Chomsky and O. Peter Sherwood of counsel), for respondents.

Marilyn S. Dymond and Marjorie E. Karowe for intervenors-respondents.

Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur; Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judge BELLACOSA taking no part.


ALEXANDER, J.

We are called upon on this appeal to resolve the issue left open in Cove v Sise (71 N.Y.2d 910): namely, whether the Classification Review Board of the Unified Court System (the Board) has the authority to reclassify job classifications established by the Chief Administrative Judge (CAJ) when it finds that such...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases