1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 226 N.J.
  5. 226 N.J. Super. 229 (1988)
 

ROTHMAN v. DEPT. OF COM. AFFAIRS

226 N.J. Super. 229 (1988)

543 A.2d 1035

LEONARD ROTHMAN AND MILDRED ROTHMAN AND ROTHMAN REALTY CORP., APPELLANTS, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, BUREAU OF HOUSING INSPECTION, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 30, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard Rothman, appellant, argued the cause pro se and for appellant Mildred Rothman.

Robert W. Goodman argued the cause for appellant Rothman Realty Corp.

Donald M. Palombi, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General, James J. Ciancia, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel and Donald M. Palombi, on the brief).

Before Judges BILDER and SKILLMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether three buildings in Cliffside Park owned by appellants are "multiple dwellings" as defined in N.J.S.A. 55:13A-3(k) and therefore subject to the regulatory authority of the Commissioner of Community Affairs (the Commissioner) under the Hotel and Multiple Dwelling Law, N.J.S.A. 55:13A-1 et seq. Appellants argue that the buildings, each of which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases