1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 370 S.E.2d
  5. 370 S.E.2d 82 (1988)
 

STROTHER v. N.C. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS.

No. 8810SC156.

370 S.E.2d 82 (1988)

90 N.C. App. 734

Douglas M. STROTHER and Rebecca T. Strother v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 19, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Holleman and Stam by Paul Stam, Jr., Apex, for plaintiff-appellants.

Yates, Fleishman, McLamb & Weyher by R. Scott Brown, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

EAGLES, Judge.

Neither the cause nor the amount of damage is in dispute. The sole issue is whether the collapse of the greenhouses is a loss which the insurance policy covers. We hold that it is.

The relevant provision of the policy reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

PERILS INSURED AGAINST We insure for direct loss to the property described in Coverage F caused by: .... 2. Windstorm or hail ....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases