KNICKERBOCKER v. CITY OF STOCKTON

Docket No. C000527.

199 Cal.App.3d 235 (1988)

244 Cal. Rptr. 764

DAVID KNICKERBOCKER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF STOCKTON et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 3, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Steven P. Stein and Sat Karam Kaur Shalsa for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Mayall, Hurley, Knutsen, Smith & Green and John Wm. Nolan for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

SPARKS, J.

In this case we consider the relationship between the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies and judicial review under the administrative mandamus statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.)

(1) (See fn. 1.) Plaintiff David Knickerbocker appeals from the order sustaining a demurrer to his second amended complaint without leave to amend.1 He asserts his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases