DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CIKRAJI

D.D. No. 87-8.

35 Ohio St. 3d 7 (1988)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CIKRAJI.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 6, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Warren Bettis, disciplinary counsel, and Charles T. Brown, for relator.

Robert M. Cikraji, pro se, and Richard F. Patton, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

This court finds that respondent violated DR 7-101(A)(2), 7-101(A)(3), and 6-101(A)(3). Respondent had an obligation to turn over to Tomson whatever materials he possessed in the Hunter, Zimmer, and Kuhl matters so that Tomson could pursue these claims. Respondent failed to do so promptly. Even if the documents in respondent's possession were as inconsequential as he now asserts, representation, at a minimum, required that he provide Tomson explanatory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases