1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 52 Wn.
  5. 52 Wn. App. 368 (1988)
 

STATE v. HANSON

No. 10345-1-II.

52 Wn. App. 368 (1988)

760 P.2d 941

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. LEE ARTHUR HANSON, JR., Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

September 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark L. Yelish and Crawford, McGilliard, Peterson & Yelish, for appellant (appointed counsel for appeal).

C. Danny Clem, Prosecuting Attorney, and Anthony C. Otto, Deputy, for respondent.

ALEXANDER, J.

Lee Arthur Hanson, Jr., appeals his conviction of four counts of delivery of a controlled substance. He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to dismiss the charges based on what he alleges was a violation of the "time for trial" rule, CrR 3.3. We affirm.

On April 15, 1985, the prosecuting attorney for Kitsap County filed an information in Kitsap County Superior Court charging Hanson with one count of delivery of a controlled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases