1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 178 Ill.
  5. 178 Ill. App.3d 229 (1988)
 

LAM v. LYNCH MACHINERY DIVISION

No. 87-1461.

178 Ill. App.3d 229 (1988)

533 N.E.2d 37

TU HOU LAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LYNCH MACHINERY DIVISION OF LYNCH CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (5th Division).

Rehearing denied January 25, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Christian and Sandra D. Oliszewicz, both of Phelan, Pope & John, Ltd., of Chicago, for appellant.

Lord, Bissell & Brook, of Chicago (David R. Schmidt and Hugh C. Griffin, of counsel), for appellee.

Reversed and remanded.

JUSTICE MURRAY delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Tu Hou Lam, appeals from a judgment for defendant, Lynch Machinery Division of Lynch Corporation (Lynch), in a personal injury action. She contends that the trial court erred in not allowing her to examine the potential biases of witnesses. Plaintiff also appeals from an order of the trial court denying her post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases