GRIPPO v. SCHRENELL AND CO.


223 N.J. Super. 154 (1988)

538 A.2d 404

THOMAS GRIPPO, PLAINTIFF, v. SCHRENELL AND CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND BROWN & MATTHEWS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND JOHN DOE AND TIMEPLEX, INC., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 29, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Clemente argued the cause for appellant.

Joseph DeDonato argued the cause for respondent Brown & Matthews, Inc. (Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, attorneys; Joseph DeDonato of counsel and on the letter brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, O'BRIEN and STERN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.H., P.J.A.D.

This appeal raises the question of whether the 1983 amendment to N.J.S.A. 2A:40A-1, which removed the prohibition of all indemnification agreements in construction contracts, should be given prospective or retroactive application. The judge below applied the amendment retroactively. We now affirm.

Brown & Matthews, Inc. (Brown &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases