1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 205 Cal.App.3d
  5. 205 Cal.App.3d 153 (1988)
 

ZIMMERMAN v. DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT INC.

Docket No. B035356.

205 Cal.App.3d 153 (1988)

252 Cal. Rptr. 115

MURRAY C. ZIMMERMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT INCORPORATED, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

October 17, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Keesal, Young & Logan, Samuel A. Keesal, Jr., Robert H. Logan, Robert D. Feighner and Dawn M. Schock for Defendant and Appellant.

Fierstein & Sturman, Lee F. Colton, Robert S. Mann and Robert A. Schwartz for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

McCLOSKY, Acting P.J.

This is an appeal of a June 16, 1988, trial court order which denied the motion of appellant Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated (Drexel) to compel arbitration and imposed $5,840 in sanctions on Drexel and its counsel, the law firm of Keesal, Young & Logan. The trial court found that the motion "was filed in bad faith and solely for the purpose of delay, based on counsel's failure to file the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases