1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 199 Cal.App.3d
  5. 199 Cal.App.3d 138 (1988)
 

BLITZSTEIN v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Docket No. A037884.

199 Cal.App.3d 138 (1988)

244 Cal. Rptr. 624

LOU BLITZSTEIN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

March 2, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Mary C. Michel and Susan K. Meadows, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant.

Stephen M. Gallenson and Chris P. Andrian for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

LOW, P.J.

In this case, we hold that the advisements required by the Implied Consent Law (Veh. Code, §§ 23157, 23157.5) to be given to a motorist suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs are neither inherently confusing nor ambiguous, and plaintiff's refusal to chemical testing was not excused.

Plaintiff Lou Blitzstein had his driver's license...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases