BARTON v. BUTLER CTY. BD. OF ELECTIONS

No. 88-1730.

39 Ohio St. 3d 291 (1988)

[THE STATE, EX REL.] BARTON ET AL. v. BUTLER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 20, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norma Barton and John Barton, pro se.

John F. Holcomb, prosecuting attorney, and Victoria Daiker, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Respondent argues that relators have an adequate remedy at law via an injunction. We agree and find an additional reason why prohibition is inappropriate.

For a writ of prohibition to issue, a court must find that the respondent is about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, that the exercise of such power is unauthorized by law, and that relator has no other adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Judson, v. Spahr ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases