1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 62 Ohio
  5. 62 Ohio App.3d 248 (1988)
 

STATE v. STRUTTON

No. 10902.

62 Ohio App.3d 248 (1988)

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. STRUTTON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Montgomery County.

Decided November 2, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee C. Falke, prosecuting attorney, and George A. Katchmer, Jr., assistant prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Willard R. Strutton, pro se, appellant.

FAIN, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Willard Strutton, appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief, with prejudice. Strutton contends that in his petition for relief he alleged that his guilty plea was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel with sufficient particularity to entitle him to a hearing. We agree. Accordingly, the dismissal of Strutton's petition for post-conviction relief will be reversed, and this cause will be remanded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases