MOSHIKO v. SEIGER & SMITH


137 A.D.2d 170 (1988)

Moshiko, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Seiger & Smith, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Appellant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 19, 1988


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Carcich of counsel (Kenneth P. Fremont, Alvin P. Bluthman and Alan J. Brill with him on the brief; Kroll & Tract, attorneys), for respondents-appellants.

Arthur N. Brook of counsel (Jeffrey S. Weinstein with him on the brief; Mount, Cotton & Wollan, attorneys), for appellant-respondent.

ROSS and ASCH, JJ., concur with SULLIVAN, J.; KUPFERMAN, J. P., and MILONAS, J., dissent in part in an opinion by KUPFERMAN, J. P.


SULLIVAN, J.

The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania) appeals from an order which, inter alia, granted summary judgment to Varda, Inc., its insured, as to liability only, and dismissed the action against Varda's broker, Seiger & Smith, Inc. and its president, Steven A. Vasaka. The court's ruling, based on a finding of ambiguity, effectively rewrote Pennsylvania's policy to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases