ARMSTRONG v. SAFECO INS. CO.

No. 19084-9-I.

50 Wn. App. 254 (1988)

748 P.2d 666

JACK C. ARMSTRONG, ET AL, Appellants, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 8, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Burns, Mathew D. Griffin, and James J. Rosenberger, for appellants.

James P. Hunter and Anderson, Hunter, Dewell, Baker & Collins, P.S., for respondent.


RINGOLD, J.

This case presents an issue of first impression concerning an insurer's refusal to renew an auto policy. RCW 48.18.292(1) requires an insurer which does not renew to give 20 days' notice to the insured and to include the actual reason for refusal to renew.

Jack C. Armstrong, the insured under an auto policy, contends that the statutory requirement of "the actual reason" for nonrenewal requires a reason based upon good cause. Safeco Insurance Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases